A NEW GENERAL THEORY
James A. Putnam
Ó -59912007
PART I PART II PART III PART IV
FUNDAMENTAL FREQUENCY
RELATIONSHIPS ![]()
The
theoretical concept of frequency is a useful vehicle for
describing energetic photons. For example, the energy of a photon is related to
frequency through a very simple relationship. This relationship uses only a
proportionality constant called Planck's constant.
Planck's Constant is the proportionality constant relating energy
to frequency. This relationship is a primary tool of quantum physics. It is
interpreted to show where there is energy there is also frequency. Where there
is frequency there is also wavelength. In other words, where there is energy
there is a wave nature. The relationship is:
![]()
In this theory, the units of energy are meters. The units of
frequency remain inverse seconds. Therefore, the units of Planck's constant are
meters times seconds.
Planck's relation between energy and frequency is one of three
such relations of interest. There is an analogous relationship between force
and frequency. To show this I begin with:
![]()
For a photon:
![]()
So I write:
![]()
Dividing both sides by the incremental xc:
![]()
Since:
![]()
Then:
![]()
Solving for force:
![]()
In order to divide Planck's constant h by
a theoretically accurate length of a photon, I will use the ideal radius of the
hydrogen atom. In this theory this ideal size is given by:
![]()
Substituting:
![]()
In the terms of current modern physics this equation is analogous
to:
![]()
Where C is the speed of light and qe is the fundamental unit of electrical
charge. Substituting the appropriate values:

I used the units that are correct for this new theory. Even so,
the value of the constant of proportionality is very recognizable. Its
magnitude is the same as that of Boltzmann's constant. The units are not the
same. However, this circumstance only represents a major conflict between the
units of this theory and current modern physics. I offer the possibility that:
![]()
Where k represents Boltzmann's constant. I did
not include my usual subscripts because I want to show it in a form consistent
with the well-known energy as a function of frequency equation given before it.
I will shortly show an application for this new relationship.
There can also be shown a relationship between photon momentum and
frequency. I will solve for the proportionality constant of this relationship.
Since force can be defined as:
![]()
Then, using the equation derived in the last section, I can write:
![]()
Where k is Boltzmann's constant. Solving for
momentum:
![]()
The proportionality constant is:
![]()
Introducing a symbol for this constant:
![]()
The relationship can then be written for photons as:
![]()
It is of theoretical importance that Boltzmann's constant appears to be a part of the frequency relationships discussed above. This occurs because:
![]()
This relationship now allows me to mix formulas that contain
either of these constants. For example, I can investigate the possible
theoretical meaning of equating:
![]()
And:
![]()
Combining these equations yields:
![]()
Rearranging terms:
![]()
Or:
![]()
The right side of this equation offers an interesting interpretation
that is consistent with results offered earlier in this theory. The value of
the incremental xc is the local measurement of the radius
of the hydrogen atom. I have previously shown the remote measurement is 2/3 the local measurement. This result then
offers an explanation for the value of 3/2 in the known expression for the kinetic energy of an ideal
gas molecule. That expression is:
![]()
The fraction 3/2
is an inverse representation of the remote measurement of the radius of the hydrogen
atom. Solving for T:

This formula shows that temperature is a remote measurement. The
units of temperature are those of velocity. It appears that temperature is the
rate of propagation of kinetic energy between gas atoms. Substituting the value
of the length of the photon:
![]()
Yielding the relationship:
![]()
Which says what is already commonly established, that temperature
is directly related to frequency.
These equations were derived using photon qualities. Therefore,
they demonstrate the quantization of force, energy, momentum and temperature.
They are applicable to helping define quantum mechanics type properties of the
universe.
Thermodynamic entropy is defined as a mathematical function. It does not have a physical explanation. In this section of theory, temperature, entropy, Boltzmann’s constant and Planck’s constant will be given clear, physical meanings.
My use of the term, thermodynamic properties, refers to those for which we may make macroscopic measurements. Both pressure and temperature are representative of this definition. There is one further general requirement. The measurement of such properties must be done under conditions of equilibrium. Temperature is commonly defined as a property that demonstrates when two or more systems are in thermal equilibrium. If two systems have the same temperature, they are in thermal equilibrium. If they are placed in contact, separated only by a wall that readily transfers heat, then, from the macroscopic perspective no heat will be exchanged. Heat is energy in transit, and there is no resultant energy transferred.
Equilibrium can be approximated even for systems undergoing change, so long as the changes are quasistatic. When external forces act on a system, or when the system exerts a force that acts on its surroundings, then all such forces must act quasistatically. This means forces must vary so slightly that any thermodynamic imbalance is infinitesimally small. In other words, the system is always infinitesimally near a state of true equilibrium. If a property such as temperature changes, it must do so slowly that there is no more than an infinitesimal temperature variation between any two points within the system.
In the work that follows, all parts of a system are in states of equilibrium with one another. Different systems are not necessarily in equilibrium with one another. However, all changes that occur between systems or parts of systems occur sufficiently slowly that each part of all systems, and each system as a whole, from the macroscopic perspective, remain infinitesimally close to equilibrium.
Entropy is defined as a mathematical function demonstrating an ideal relationship between the transfer of heat and constant temperature. The entropy function is:
![]()
Where DS is a change in entropy, DQ is the transfer of heat either into or out of a system, and T is the temperature of the system in degrees Kelvin. This equation is based upon an ideal model of an engine called a Carnot engine. The engine operates in a Carnot cycle.
There are two near infinite sources of heat. One is at temperature Thigh, the other at temperature Tlow. The Carnot engine operates cyclically between these two temperatures. The engine will absorb heat from source Thigh and reject heat to source Tlow. For this example the working substance is a simple gas. Before the cycle begins, the engine is in contact and thermal equilibrium with heat source Tlow. This is the point from which the cycle will start:
1. The engine is separated from source Tlow and the first part of the cycle begins. The gas is adiabatically, i.e. no conduction of heat either into or out of the gas, compressed until its temperature rises to the level of Thigh.
2. The engine is placed in contact with source Thigh and the second part of the cycle begins. The gas volume expands while remaining at temperature Thigh.
3. The engine is removed from contact with Thigh. The heated gas continues to expand adiabatically, i.e. no heat flows in or out, until its temperature falls to that of source Tlow.
4. The engine is put in contact with source Tlow and, the gas is compressed while remaining at temperature Tlow until the engine has returned to its initial state of temperature and volume.
It is known for a Carnot cycle that:
![]()
The values of Thigh and Tlow may both vary, but the relationship remains true. This relationship is the basis of the definition of thermodynamic entropy. The entropy definition is:
![]()
The entropy of the gas will increase when expanding while in contact with Thigh and will decrease when compressing while in contact with Tlow. Therefore, the increase in entropy is given by:
![]()
And the decrease in entropy is given by:
![]()
For a Carnot cycle, their sum is:
![]()
There is no net change in entropy for the Carnot engine. For a series of Carnot engines joined side by side, they would have an increase in entropy given by:
![]()
For the latter part of the cycle, the decrease in entropy would equal:
![]()
The convention is that heat entering the engine is positive and heat leaving the engine is negative.
For both series of variations of heat, it does not matter how their individual temperatures vary. The change in entropy, whether increasing or decreasing, is always equal to its final value minus its initial value. In other words, the sums of changes in entropy, either increasing or decreasing, will be the same regardless of how the temperature varies. If the series of engines each have infinitesimally small transfers of heat, then the equations become differential. The equation for the increase in entropy would become:
![]()
The corresponding decrease in entropy would have an analogous change in form. In the differential form, the equations for the series of Carnot engines accurately represent a continuous path on a generalized work diagram so long as the engine represented is quasistatic, i.e. no dissipative effects, and reversible, i.e. returns to initial conditions at the end of each cycle. The differential forms of these equations may be solved by means of calculus for the changes in entropy of this ideal type of engine.
The definition of entropy shows how entropy is calculated, but does not make clear what is entropy. It is a mathematical function and not an explained physics property. Heat is energy in transit. I am using the mks system of units, so the units of entropy are joules per degree Kelvin. It is temperature that masks the identity of entropy. Temperature is an indefinable property in theoretical physics. It is accepted as a fundamentally unique property along with distance, time, mass, and electric charge. If the physical action, that is temperature, was identified then entropy would be explainable.
What is entropy? It is something whose nature should be easily seen, because, its derivation is part of the operation of the simple, fundamental Carnot engine. The answer can be found in the operation of the Carnot engine. The Carnot engine is the most efficient engine, theoretically speaking. Its efficiency is independent of the nature of the working medium, in this case a simple gas. The efficiency depends only upon the values of the high and low temperatures in degrees Kelvin. Degrees Kelvin must be used because the Kelvin temperature scale is derived based upon the Carnot cycle. The engine’s equation of efficiency and the definition of the Kelvin temperature scale are the basis for the derivation of the equation:
![]()
Something very important happens during this derivation that establishes a definite rate of operation of the Carnot cycle. The engine is defined as operating quasistatically. The general requirement for this to be true is that the engine should operate so slowly that the temperature of the working medium should always measure the same at any point within the medium. This is a condition that must be met for a system to be described as operating infinitesimally close to equilibrium.
There are any number of rates of operation that will satisfy this condition; however, there is one specific rate, above which, the equilibrium will be lost. Any slower rate will work fine. The question is: What is this rate of operation that separates equilibrium from disequilibrium? It is important to know this because this is the rate that becomes fixed into the derivation of the Carnot engine. This occurs because the engine is defined such that the ratio of its heat absorbed to its heat rejected equals the ratio of the temperatures of the high and low heat sources:
This special, and necessarily fundamental, rate of operation could be identified if the physical meaning of temperature was made clear. In this new theory, temperature is indicative of the rate of exchange of energy between molecules. It is not quantitatively the same as the rate, because, temperature is assigned unique units of measurement that are not time, distance, or a combination of these two. Temperature is assigned the units of degrees and its scale is arbitrarily fitted to the freezing and boiling points of water. The temperature difference between these points on the Kelvin scale is set at 100 degrees.
For this reason, the quantitative measurement of temperature is not the same as the quantitative measurement of exchange of energy between molecules. However, this discrepancy can be moderated with the introduction of a constant of proportionality:
![]()
Multiplying by dt:
![]()
This equation indicates that the differential of entropy is:
![]()
Both dS and dt are variables. It is necessary to determine a value for the constant kT. This value may be contained in the ideal gas law:
![]()
Where k is Boltzmann’s constant. If I let n=1, then the equation gives the kinetic energy of a single molecule. In this case E becomes DE an incremental value of energy. Substituting:
![]()
This suggests that for an ideal gas molecule:
![]()
In other words, the entropy of a single ideal gas molecule is a constant. The condition under which this is true is when the gas molecules act like billiard balls and their pressure is very close to zero. Near zero pressure for any practical temperature requires the gas molecules be low in number and widely dispersed.
I interpret this to mean, under these conditions, that the thermodynamic measurement of temperature and kinetic energy approach single molecule status. Normally, thermodynamic properties do not apply to small numbers of molecules. However, sometimes it is instructive to establish a link between individual molecules and thermodynamic properties, as is done in the development of the kinetic theory of gases. The case at hand is an inherent part of the kinetic theory of gases.
The ideal gas law written for a single gas molecule gives reason to consider that for a single molecule:
![]()
Substituting for Boltzmann’s constant:
I have defined Entropy as:
![]()
Therefore, I write:
![]()
If I could establish a value for Dt, then I could calculate kT. Since this calculation is assumed to apply to a single gas molecule and is a constant value, I assume that in this special case, Dt is a fundamental increment of time. In this theory, there is one fundamental increment of time. It is:
![]()
Substituting this value and solving for kT:

Substituting the units for each quantity as determined by this new theory and dropping the single molecule indicator:
![]()
The value kT is a unit free constant of proportionality. It also follows that Boltzmann’s constant is defined as:
![]()
For the ideal gas equation, the entropy of each molecule is a constant:
![]()
However, thermodynamic entropy is defined as an aggregate macroscopic function. I have a value for the constant kT, but the increment of time in the macroscopic function is not a constant. There are a great number of molecules involved and their interactions overlap and add together. It is a variable. I expand the meaning of entropy into its more general form and substitute kT into the general thermodynamic definition of entropy:
![]()
The Dt in this equation is not the same as the Dtc in the equation for a single molecule. In the macroscopic version, it is the time required for a quantity of energy, in the form of heat, to be transferred at the rate represented by the temperature in degrees Kelvin.
Substituting this equation for entropy into the general energy equation:
![]()
Recognizing the increment of energy represents an increment of heat entering or leaving the engine, and solving for DS:
![]()
Solving for Dt:
![]()
This function of Dt is what would have become defined as the function of entropy if temperature had been defined directly as the rate of transfer of energy between molecules. The arbitrary definition of temperature made it necessary for the definition of entropy to include the proportionality constant kT. Writing an equation to show this:
In particular:

For a Carnot engine:
![]()
Therefore:

And the increments of time must be equivalent. This is why the increase in entropy is exactly the opposite of the decrease in entropy for the Carnot engine. The increments of time are identical. The increment of heat entering the engine carries the positive sign, and the increment of energy leaving the engine carries the negative sign.
Now, I consider an engine that operates infinitesimally close to equilibrium conditions, but has heat loss that does not result in work. The heat that is successfully converted into work can be represented by a series of Carnot engines. For this series, the change in entropy per cycle is zero. The lost heat can be treated as if it just passes through the engine. The engine becomes a pathway for the lost heat to travel from the high heat source to the low heat source. The entropy of the engine is not changed by this loss of heat. The entropies that are affected are those of the high heat source and the low heat source. The entropies are measures of time required for the lost heat to be released by the high heat source and later absorbed by the low heat source. The equation showing the net change in entropy is:
![]()
The quantity of heat transferred is the same in both cases. The rates at which that heat will be transferred are different. The low temperature represents a slower rate of exchange of heat than for the high temperature. This means it takes longer for the low temperature source to absorb the quantity of lost heat than it does for the high temperature source to emit the heat.
This time difference is the change that occurs and it is what is represented by the measure of change of entropy. The high heat source loses entropy because it requires extra time for the lost heat to leave the source. The low heat source gains entropy because it requires extra time to absorb the heat that is simply passing through the engine without being converted into work.
Heat that leaves a source is negative heat. Heat that enters a source is positive heat. There is a decrease in molecular activity for the heat source that gives up the heat. There is a corresponding increase in molecular activity for the heat source that receives the heat. There is no net change of energy. What is lost here is gained there.
In my definition of entropy, I established meaning for Boltzmann’s constant. In this theory, giving meaning to Boltzmann’s constant necessarily means establishing meaning for Planck’s constant. Establishing meaning for fundamental constants contributes to achieving a unified theory.
3. Interpreting Planck's
Constant
In this theory, Boltzmann’s constant has acquired the definition of:
![]()
I have previously shown a relationship between Planck’s constant h and Boltzmann’s constant k:
![]()
Substituting for k and rearranging terms:
![]()
I moved the fraction into the parenthesis with photon length because, as has been shown earlier in the theory, this term demonstrates the definition to include a remote measurement. In other words, we determine the value of Planck’s constant by making remote macroscopic measurements of the energy of photons.
This interpretation of Planck’s constant allows for a modification to the definition of entropy. Using the equation:
![]()
Since:
![]()
Substituting:
![]()
Since:
![]()
Substituting:
![]()
Rearranging:
![]()
Planck’s constant is a part of the above equation so long as it applies to an ideal gas. However, for the entropy definition Dtc was replaced with the variable Dt in order that the equation may apply to more general cases. Making the same change in this analogous derivation:
![]()
Defining an analogy to entropy for frequency:
![]()
Substituting:
![]()
So,
Planck’s constant is the constant DSp for an ideal gas, while
the form above is the variable form for general cases. Now I wish to give a detailed
general definition for Planck's constant.
4. Analyzing
Planck’s Constant
The
potential energy of the hydrogen electron in its first energy level is:
![]()
Where:
![]()
Substituting
for the speed of light:

The
denominator on the right side is the period of the frequency. Therefore:
![]()
Also,
the potential energy for a circular orbit can be expressed as:
![]()
Therefore:
![]()
Solving
for Planck’s constant:
![]()
This
result defines Planck’s constant in terms of properties of the hydrogen atom.
I have preliminarily defined
temperature as:
![]()
I have also derived:
![]()
Solving for kT :

Since:
![]()
Then:

6. Defining Boltzmann’s Constant
I have established a relationship
between Planck’s constant and Boltzmann’s constant as:
![]()
Substituting for Planck’s
constant:

Substituting for kT :
![]()
Or,
in terms of momentum:
![]()
Where:
![]()
I have defined:
![]()
Substituting
for kB :
![]()
Also:
![]()